Harmful effects of mobile phones on human health

  • 5 Harmful Effects Of Mobile Phones On Your Brain.
  • Health risks associated with mobile phones use.
  • Search form?

For example, it is impossible to know who is using the listed cell phone or whether that individual also places calls using other cell phones. To a lesser extent, it is not clear whether multiple users of a single phone, for example family members who may share a device, will be represented on a single phone company account. Additionally, for many long-term cohort studies, participation tends to decline over time. There are theoretical considerations as to why the possible risk should be investigated separately in children.

Their nervous systems are still developing and, therefore, more vulnerable to factors that may cause cancer. Their heads are smaller than those of adults and consequently have a greater proportional exposure to the field of radiofrequency radiation that is emitted by cell phones. And, children have the potential of accumulating more years of cell phone exposure than adults do. Thus far, the data from studies in children with cancer do not support this theory. The study included children who were diagnosed with brain tumors between and , when their ages ranged from 7 to 19 years.

Researchers did not find an association between cell phone use and brain tumor risk either by time since initiation of use, amount of use, or by the location of the tumor Several studies that will provide more information are under way. Researchers from the Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology in Spain are conducting another international case—control study— Mobi-Kids —that will include young people aged 10—24 years with newly diagnosed brain tumors and healthy young people. The goal of the study is to learn more about risk factors for childhood brain tumors.

Hands-free kits reduce the amount of radiofrequency radiation exposure to the head because the antenna, which is the source of energy, is not placed against the head The FCC provides information about the specific absorption rate SAR of cell phones produced and marketed within the last 1 to 2 years. The SAR corresponds with the relative amount of radiofrequency radiation absorbed by the head of a cell phone user In the United States, 23, new diagnoses and 17, deaths from brain and other central nervous system cancers are estimated for Brain cancer incidence rates have declined slightly in recent years and mortality death rates have increased slightly There is great variability in survival by brain tumor subtype, and by age at diagnosis.

5 Harmful Effects Of Mobile Phones On Your Brain

Overall, the 5-year relative survival for brain cancers diagnosed from through was This is the percentage of people diagnosed with brain cancer who will still be alive 5 years after diagnosis compared with the survival of a person of the same age and sex who does not have cancer. The risk of developing brain cancer increases with age. From through , there were fewer than 4. Menu Contact Dictionary Search.

Cancer Causes and Prevention. Risk Factors. Cancer Prevention Overview. Cancer Screening Overview. Screening Tests. Diagnosis and Staging. Questions to Ask about Your Diagnosis. Types of Cancer Treatment. Side Effects of Cancer Treatment. Clinical Trials Information. A to Z List of Cancer Drugs. Questions to Ask about Your Treatment.

Feelings and Cancer. Adjusting to Cancer. Support for Caregivers. Questions to Ask About Cancer. Choices for Care. Talking about Your Advanced Cancer. Planning for Advanced Cancer. Advanced Cancer and Caregivers. Questions to Ask about Advanced Cancer. Finding Health Care Services. Advance Directives. Using Trusted Resources. What Is Cancer? Cancer Statistics. Cancer Disparities. Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. Reports, Research, and Literature. Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Treatment.

Pediatric Supportive Care. Unusual Cancers of Childhood Treatment. Childhood Cancer Genomics. Study Findings. Metastatic Cancer Research. Intramural Research. Extramural Research. Bioinformatics, Big Data, and Cancer.

5 Reasons Why Cellphones Are Bad For Your Health

Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research. Spotlight on Scientists. Cancer Genomics Research. Research on Causes of Cancer. Cancer Diagnosis Research. Cancer Prevention Research. Cancer Treatment Research. Cancer Health Disparities. Global Cancer Research. Annual Report to the Nation. Milestones in Cancer Research and Discovery. Stories of Discovery. Terminology Resources. Research Funding Opportunities. Research Program Contacts. Funding Strategy.

Grants Policies and Process. Introduction to Grants Process. NCI Grant Policies. Legal Requirements. Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Peer Review and Funding Outcomes. Step 4: Grants Management Contacts. Prior Approvals. Annual Reporting and Auditing. In animal studies, it has not been found to cause cancer or to enhance the cancer-causing effects of known chemical carcinogens. In a World Health Organization working group classified cell phone use as "possibly carcinogenic to humans".

The CDC states that no scientific evidence definitively answers whether cell phone use causes cancer. In a statement, the FDA said that "the current safety limits are set to include a fold safety margin from observed effects of radiofrequency energy exposure".


An analysis of an "eagerly anticipated" study using rats and mice by the National Toxicology Program indicates that due such issues as the inconsistent appearances of "signals for harm" within and across species and the increased chances of false positives due to the multiplicity of tests, the positive results seen are more likely due to random chance. The full results of the study were released in February A decline in male sperm quality has been observed over several decades.

Some users of mobile phones and similar devices have reported feeling various non-specific symptoms during and after use. Studies have failed to link any of these symptoms to electromagnetic exposure. In addition, EHS is not a recognised medical diagnosis. According to the National Cancer Institute , two small studies exploring whether and how cell phone radiation affects brain glucose metabolism showed inconsistent results.

Experts consulted by France considered it was mandatory that the main antenna axis should not to be directly in front of a living place at a distance shorter than metres. In order to protect the population living around base stations and users of mobile handsets, governments and regulatory bodies adopt safety standards, which translate to limits on exposure levels below a certain value.

There are many proposed national and international standards, but that of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection ICNIRP is the most respected one, and has been adopted so far by more than 80 countries. Currently there are efforts underway to harmonise the different standards in existence. Many governmental bodies also require that competing telecommunication companies try to achieve sharing of towers so as to decrease environmental and cosmetic impact.

This issue is an influential factor of rejection of installation of new antennas and towers in communities. In the US , a small number of personal injury lawsuits have been filed by individuals against cellphone manufacturers including Motorola , [28] NEC , Siemens , and Nokia on the basis of allegations of causation of brain cancer and death. In US federal courts, expert testimony relating to science must be first evaluated by a judge, in a Daubert hearing , to be relevant and valid before it is admissible as evidence.

In a case against Motorola , the plaintiffs alleged that the use of wireless handheld telephones could cause brain cancer and that the use of Motorola phones caused one plaintiff's cancer. The judge ruled that no sufficiently reliable and relevant scientific evidence in support of either general or specific causation was proffered by the plaintiffs, accepted a motion to exclude the testimony of the plaintiffs' experts, and denied a motion to exclude the testimony of the defendants' experts.

Two separate cases in Italy , in [30] [31] and , [32] [33] resulted in pensions being awarded to plaintiffs who had claimed their benign brain tumors were the result of prolonged mobile phone use in professional tasks, for 5—6 hours a day, which they ruled different from non-professional use. In , the World Health Organization WHO recommended that the precautionary principle could be voluntarily adopted in this case. According to the WHO, the "precautionary principle" is "a risk management policy applied in circumstances with a high degree of scientific uncertainty, reflecting the need to take action for a potentially serious risk without awaiting the results of scientific research.

Although all of these are problematic in application, due to the widespread use and economic importance of wireless telecommunication systems in modern civilization, there is an increased popularity of such measures in the general public, though also evidence that such approaches may increase concern. In May , the World Health Organization 's International Agency for Research on Cancer announced it was classifying electromagnetic fields from mobile phones and other sources as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" and advised the public to adopt safety measures to reduce exposure, like use of hands-free devices or texting.

Some national radiation advisory authorities, including those of Austria, [38] France, [39] Germany , [40] and Sweden, [41] have recommended measures to minimize exposure to their citizens. Examples of the recommendations are:. The use of "hands-free" was not recommended by the British Consumers' Association in a statement in November , as they believed that exposure was increased. In , Professor Lawrie Challis and others said clipping a ferrite bead onto hands-free kits stops the radio waves travelling up the wire and into the head.

Several nations have advised moderate use of mobile phones for children. Also, with the permittivity of the brain decreasing as one gets older and the higher relative volume of the exposed growing brain in children, radiation penetrates far beyond the mid-brain. According to the FTC, "there is no scientific proof that so-called shields significantly reduce exposure from electromagnetic emissions. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Common types. Safety and regulation. Mobile phone radiation and health Wireless electronic devices and health International Telecommunication Union Radio Regulations. Beam steering Beam tilt Beamforming Small cell. Reconfiguration Spread spectrum. See also: Wireless electronic devices and health and Electromagnetic radiation and health. Non-ionizing radiation. Main article: This range compared to the Addiction possible level.

Essentials that were employed to measure the level and generate the Mobile Phone Problem utilize level where the measure of time single use their cell phone and the kind of usage. The behavioural predictors that move the price of cell phone usage were: These qualities were all important in an influential problematical cell phone make use of. The survey indicates that these behavioural predictors did not control the cost of cell phone usage: The level urbanized was planned to help out through implement any intervention for possible addictive behaviour [ 10 ].

Getting old was the key reason in predicting the challenges of the cell phone use.


That is why further psychologists have executed the study focus on youth. Koo et al. The results of the questionnaires were as follows: Few contradictory results were made by Koo et al. The biggest challenge was that Bianchi et al. The cell phone usage is usually addictive and especially in young ages.

Sanchez-Carbonell et al. Outcomes of these studies declared that the Internet does not because the possible compassionate the cell phone usage does not encourage fast affecting change [ 13 ]. Once again we observed a different point of outlook where Bianchi et al. Over again, the question is, are the cell phones addictive? Clearly a new study has to be completed to answer this query. Other things should be regarded as of the existing research condition, such as age and gender are.

If cell phones are not addictive, can they bring any violent disorder? Dismiss it or does it morphs as by compulsion to a violent disorder by era? If youth and adults are more liable to cell phone compulsion, what is the longest tenure repercussion? What intervention should be meted out in alignment with the achievable compulsion? What preventive steps should be in use against it? Optimistically in the not too far-away future these pending questions will be answered [ 14 ]. This study based on survey questionnaire and the data is obtained from numerous physicians.

The secondary data collected from the research journals, articles and the texts. The survey questionnaire distributed among the medical doctors and other Para medical staff. The questionnaire consists of six questions which cover adequate information regarding mobile phone devices that cause consequence on human body and the diseases induced by them.

There are questionnaires which were presented to the medical doctors of different hospitals. In the outcome, each physician has given their own idea in relation to the effects of mobile phone devices on the human body, by their observations concerning the patients. Data collection was started from November to February from different hospitals of Karachi. Firstly, Civil Hospital Karachi was visited with the permission of respective civil surgeon of the concern hospital and survey task was completed.

The questionnaires were distributed to all doctors and also interviewed for data collection around the effects on Mobile phone on the human health.

  1. Mobile phone radiation and health - Wikipedia!
  2. phone experts medicine hat mall.
  3. symbian android ou windows mobile.
  4. Health risks associated with mobile phones use!
  5. The Results are exposed in the below Figure 1. These results are evidenced in the below Figure 2. According the survey from different doctors of hospitals, the using of mobile phone leaving chronic disease like: The following Figure 3 shows results:. Comparatively space below the study has not been explored for the investigation of the potential of the results of radiations emitted by mobile phone.

    With slight variation gift study confirms the harmful effects of the radiation on human of the individuals of space handpicked for the study as discovered by medical doctors. Purposefully, correct study aimed to make awareness among the individuals in journal and therefore, the individuals living within the space below the study, to avoid the employment of such devices that is concerned within the onset of draining diseases mentioned in our study.

    Our study has discovered. The survey results from the doctors indicates regarding several dangerous results linked with the use of cellular phone on human health, this device release different types of diverse rays which affect the human Health. These rays damage the human body DNA when they penetrate in it. The present study is in agreement with Khudnitskii et al. Kellenyi et al. According to the Meo et al. According to Vasudev et al. It is concluded that by usage of the mobile phones three diseases such as the brain tumor, male infertility and ear hearing function can be affected on human health.

    Agreeing to our survey from the Civil Hospital, Karachi, Jinnah Medical Hospital, Karachi and Dow Medical University Hospital, Karachi, we found that the cell phone use is more dangerous on human health, as doctors believed that all wireless devices like cellular phones, laptop, wireless router, wireless earphone, cell telephone tower, Bluetooth devices and tablet PC are accountable for the development of diseases of brain tumor, male infertility, hearing function.

    It is advised that one should keep away from the use of Mobile phone or decrease its usage as low as possible because it may affect the human.